Using PESTLE for Prioritisation: A Sustainable Approach

18 April 2023
Using PESTLE for Prioritisation_ A Sustainable Approach

When it comes to prioritising projects, it’s important to have a clear and structured way of assessing their impact on the community and the environment. That’s why we recommend using a modification of the “PESTLE” method as part of a multi-criteria assessment framework, in conjunction with the CP3 suite.

PESTLE stands for Political, Economic, Sociocultural, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. CP3 modified this approach for local government by replacing the “L” with and “F”, which represents the word “Finance”. By taking these factors into account, we can evaluate a project’s potential impact on the triple bottom line (economic, social, and environmental), as well as its compliance with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) criteria.

Here are some of the benefits of using PESTFE in the prioritisation process:

  • It provides a structured way of thinking about the external factors that may affect a project’s success.
  •  It helps to identify potential risks and opportunities associated with a project, and to develop mitigation strategies.
  • It encourages a holistic and sustainable approach to decision-making, by taking into account the social and environmental impact of a project, as well as its financial viability.
  • By using PESTFE as part of a multi-criteria assessment framework, we can ensure that all projects are evaluated against the same criteria, and that the most impactful and sustainable projects are prioritised.
  • Most importantly, it provides an objective and transparent method which is principle-based. When the outcomes from the model is not optimal, the respective criteria of the POSTFE model can be debated instead of the individual merits of individual projects that are not necessarily directly comparable.

CP3 is a powerful tool that enables the easy configurable adoption of the principles encapsulated in the PESTFE-based prioritisation process. These criteria gets set up in a bespoke manner to refelect the needs of each municipality – there is no “one size fits all” generic solution, and that is the key! By using CP3, project scoring and ranking is automated based on alignment and responsiveness of the municipality’s own unique set of objectives.

In summary, using the PESTFE method as part of a multi-criteria assessment framework, in conjunction with CP3, is a sustainable and effective way of prioritising projects that takes into account their impact on the community, the environment, and the economy.

#Novus3 #AdvisoryServices #CP3 #Budgets #SoftwareSolutions #PeopleOrientated #LetsMakeADifference #CEF #Capex #ValueAdd #CP3Modules #CP3Functions

Capital investment prioritisation

Novus3’s innovative and celebrated approach to prioritsation, stems from significant multi-disciplinary experience that was gained in-situ at local government level, firmly rooted in an understanding of the built environment. Through the use of the CP3 system, our clients have the ability to appraise large and complex capital demand requirements within minutes, resulting in defendable, evidence based budgets. The results are often challenged and stress tested by politicians during political debates – the process therefore repeatedly have been proven to be beyond reproach and consistently reliable.

IDP Process Plan and change management

Novus3 provides advisory services to our clients, supporting them in setting up the correct structures and mechanisms internally which becomes the basis for sustainable and collaborative planning and implementation. The IDP process plan has a number of inter-related complexities that plays out on a cyclic basis year-on-year. Pre-empting and reacting to upcoming requirements in the IDP process pro-actively, renders the process into a constructive and demonstratable outcomes-based process.

Public sector budget and fiscal impact simulation

The financial management of public sector funding at local government level, even on a small scale, often rivals the complexity encountered at huge, listed, multi-national companies in the private sector.. Local governments have to operate and make smart financial decisions within a complex and exceedingly stressful environment. Compliance with legislation, policy frameworks and accepted accounting practices have to be maintained. Simulating these complexities allows our financial executives to ask “What if?” questions and reliably peer into the future with a long-term understanding of the implications of decisions that are taken in the present.

Spatial Development Frameworks

Novus3’s specialised knowledge and access to bespoke and purpose-made spatial and other analytic tools, provided the company with the opportunity to develop unparalleled experience in the development of Capital Expenditure Frameworks (CEFs) by bringing a practical angle to the formulation of implementation plans. A realistic roadmap is provided on how to realise the objectives developed in the Spatial Development Frameworks of the municipalities where we were involved. In return for the development and submission of these CEFs, these municipalities were awarded with significant additional funding from central government.

Built Environment Performance Plans

As part of the National Treasury City Support Program, Novus3 was regarded as specialist advisors on the built environment value chain – a process embedded in Built Environment Performance Plans (BEPPs). BEPPs were intended to form the bedrock of municipal capital planning and management for larger cities (metros). Novus3’s specialist knowledge played a big role from an advisory and capacity building perspective during the development of a number of BEPPs that were developed for a number of metros.

Infrastructure Capital Investment Plans

Infrastructure investment has to find a balance between addressing historical backlogs and inequalities, maintaining satisfactory prevailing functionality and level of service and strategically investing in unlocking future opportunities and growth whilst acknowledging a plethora regulatory constraints, policies and rules. In the process, certain strategic outcomes are sought which may manifest spatially strategically or environmentally. Our infrastructure capital investment plans provide the strategic guideline and provide the recommendations to find this balance.

Capital Expenditure Frameworks

Novus3 has developed multiple capital expenditure frameworks (CEFs) for multiple municipal clients and are regarded as the sector leaders in this area. These CEFs are financial roadmaps providing clear direction on financial constraints, the most important capital and investment priorities, an understanding of the unique local fundamentals and a sustainable response to these multiplicity of challenges.

Project preparation processes

The efficient planning and execution of projects from the moment of idea conception until the last brick has been laid has been the subject of study from as early as the reign of the Roman Empire. The governance process within the public sector has to play an important role in the journey of project preparation. The under-expenditure of allocated funding regrettably is often the only element in the built-environment that consistently re-occurs. All too often, funding is allocated to projects that simply are not ready to proceed to the next step. Novus3’s CP3 system is used to aid clients in the progressive steps involved in the project preparation journey.